The Role of AI-Based Technologies in Higher Education: A Comparative Study of Student Perceptions in India and Indonesia
Barra lateral de artigos
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
Purpose: This study investigates the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based technologies in higher education, comparing student perceptions and adoption patterns in India and Indonesia. It aims to evaluate how institutional, ethical, and technological factors influence learning, skill development, and the overall transformative potential of AI in educational contexts.
Design/Methodology/Approach: A quantitative, cross-sectional research design was adopted, using data from 120 higher education students across both countries. A structured questionnaire measured constructs such as Institutional Adoption, Support and Accessibility, Learning and Skill Development, Ethical and Equity Concerns, and Data Privacy. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was employed to assess measurement reliability, convergent validity, and structural relationships among the constructs.
Findings: Results reveal that institutional adoption and personalization strongly enhance support and accessibility (β = 0.234, p < 0.01; β = 0.295, p < 0.001), which in turn positively influence learning and skill development (β = 0.479, p < 0.001). Ethical concerns (β = –0.202, p < 0.05) and perceived disruptions to academic roles (β = –0.230, p < 0.05) negatively affect students’ perceptions of AI’s general impact. In contrast, data privacy and future integration factors were not significant predictors. Students express optimism regarding AI’s role in personalized learning but remain cautious about ethical and pedagogical implications.
Practical Implications: Findings suggest that effective institutional adoption, coupled with transparent ethical frameworks, is key to maximizing AI’s educational benefits in emerging economies.
Originality/Value: By integrating descriptive and structural modeling, this study contributes comparative empirical evidence from India and Indonesia, highlighting both opportunities and ethical tensions in AI-driven higher education.
Detalhes do artigo
Referências
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295–336.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Walsa, A. (2023). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International .
Maiorana, F. A., & Mayer, H. F. (2018). How to avoid common errors in writing scientific manuscripts. European Journal of Plastic Surgery .
Nagy, A. S., Tumiwa, J. R., Arie, F. V., & Erdey, L. (2024). An exploratory study of artificial intelligence adoption in higher education. COGENT EDUCATION , 1-15.
Naznin, K., & Mahmud, A. A. (2025). ChatGPT Integration in Higher Education for Personalized Learning, Academic Writing, and Coding Tasks: A Systematic Review. Present and Future of E-Learning Technologies (2nd Edition)) .
Rospigliosi, P. ‘. (2023). Artificial intelligence in teaching and learning: what questions should we ask of ChatGPT? Interactive Learning Environments , 1-3.
Sharma, S., Mittal, P., Kumar, M., & Bhardwaj, V. (2025). The role of large language models in personalized learning: a systematic review of educational impact. Discover Sustainability .
Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2022). Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 504–526. https://doi. org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1
Kreps, S., McCain, R. M., & Brundage, M. (2022). All the news that’s fit to fabricate: AI-generated text as a tool of media misinformation. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 9(1), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2020.37
Priyahita, C. P. (2020). Persepsi Mahasiswa terhadap Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 9(2), 134-147.
Miranty, D., & Widiati, U. (2021. The use of grammar checkers in academic writing by Indonesian university students. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 11(2), 276-299. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v11i2.2797
Kuleto, V., Bučíková, M., Šević, N. P., Drasković, M., & Novikov, O. (2021). The Merdeka Belajar program and its impact on the adaptability of learning models in higher education institutions in Indonesia. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 8(4), 539–549. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v8i4.792
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Lameras, P., & Arnab, S. (2022). Power to the teachers: an exploratory review on artificial intelligence in education. Information, 13(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13010014
Rasul, T., Nair, S., Kalendra, D., Robin, M., de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J., Sun, M., Day, I., Rather, R. A., & Heathcote, L. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29
Stahl, B. C., Antoniou, J., Bhalla, N., Brooks, L., Jansen, P., Lindqvist, B., Kirichenko, A., Marchal, S., Rodrigues, R., Santiago, N., Warso, Z., & Wright, D. (2023). A systematic review of artificial intelligence impact assessments. Artificial Intelligence Review. https://doi.org/10.1007s10462-023-10420-8
Maniar, N. (2023). AI-powered learning: The future of education. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology (IJARSCT), 3(1), 324-329. https://doi.org/10.48175/IJARSCT-13146
Pendy, G. (2023). Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence (AI) dalam Proses Pembelajaran di Perguruan Tinggi. Journal of Information System, Technology and Engineering, 1(3), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.61487/jiste.v1i3.22
Batubara, M., Wariyati, W., & Prawiyata, G. (2023). Kecerdasan Artifisial (AI) Dalam Pendidikan: Analisis Peluang Dan Tantangan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Global Education, 4(2), 129-137. https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v4i2.789